To The Board Members of the WGA.

My name is Larry Zerner.  I am a copyright attorney in Los Angeles.  In my practice, I represent screenwriters in lawsuits against production companies and studios for copyright infringement.

I am writing to you directly because of something that I believe should be addressed by the WGA and that is the fact that WGA Script Registry is costing your members money and is acting as a detriment, not an asset, to screenwriters. I know that sentence sounds extreme, but please let me explain.

The problem with the Script Registry is that many writers are using it as a substitute for registration with the U.S. Copyright Office.  As a result, in the event that their work is infringed, the writer will almost certainly lose thousands of dollars.  And, in many cases, a writer who only registered with the Script Registry will be precluded from filing a lawsuit because the economic realities of litigation.

The reason for this is that under U.S. copyright law, if a writer suing for copyright infringement wants to recover his attorney’s fees and/or statutory damages in the lawsuit, then the writer MUST have registered the work with the Copyright Office BEFORE the infringement began.  In the case of a motion picture, the infringement of the writer’ script began when the infringing script was written, NOT when the movie is released.  So, usually by the time the writer hears that a movie infringing the script is being released (e.g., by seeing a trailer or reading an article in the trades) it is too late.  The writer may register with the Copyright Office at that time, but he will be barred from recovering his attorney’s fees and/or receiving statutory damages.

Let me give you a hypothetical that explains the real world implications of the writer’s failure to register with the Copyright Office, especially for new and unestablished writers.

A Writer signs an option agreement with a production company to purchase his horror movie screenplay (no treatment).  The agreement says that the purchase price will be WGA minimum for a low-budget feature (currently approximately $35,000).  The option expires without being exercised.  A couple of years go by and the Writer sees that the production company have put out a movie which is the same as his screenplay, but did not pay him and did not have the right to use his screenplay as the basis for the movie.  The movie is released, but is a box office bomb and does not earn a profit.  This is pretty much as egregious a case of copyright infringement as you can imagine.  The Writer now wants to bring a lawsuit, but has only registered his screenplay with the Script Registry and not the Copyright Office.

The problem the Writer will have is that because the script was not registered with the Copyright Office, in any lawsuit the Writer can only recover 1) the actual damages caused by the infringement and 2) any profits earned by the infringer (17 U.S.C. §504(a)(1)).  Because the movie did not earn any profits, the Writer can only recover his actual damages.  In a case like this, the Writer’s actual damages would be the $35,000 low budget minimum he would have received had they studio exercised the option.  And because the Writer was not registered with the Copyright Office before the infringement, he could not recover his attorney’s fees in any lawsuit.

As you can imagine, suing a studio for copyright infringement would cost much more than $35,000 in attorney’s fees (taking a case to trial can cost more than $100,000).  And for those attorneys (like myself) who will represent writers on a contingency fee basis, there is simply not enough money at stake to justify taking the case on a contingency because the attorney’s fees would end up much higher than the possible recovery.  The end result is that no lawsuit is ever filed, the production company gets away with stealing the script, and the Writer gets nothing.  Even worse, the Writer can’t sell his script to someone else because the movie has already been made.

Now, imagine the same scenario, except that this time the Writer registered with the Copyright Office, not the Registry.  In that case, the Writer is not limited to just getting $35,000, he can ask the court for up to $150,000 in statutory damages for willful infringement of his copyright.  Also, the Writer can recover the attorney’s fees at the end of the trial.  This makes it much more likely that an attorney will represent the Writer, because the attorney knows there is a much better possible outcome.  In fact, in these scenarios, it is much more likely that the studio will settle the case early on, because it knows if it delays it will end up paying its own attorney plus the Writer’s attorney fees which in a case like this can me much more than the Writer would accept in settlement at the outset.

So the net result of a registration with the Copyright Office is 1) that it’s much more likely that the Writer will find an attorney to represent him, 2) the case will settle early on for a higher amount than if there was no registration and 3) if the case goes to trial, the writer stands to win up to $150,000, not just $35,000, plus his attorney’s fees.  Even in cases where the actual damages are significant enough for an attorney to take the case on a contingency without a prior registration with the Copyright Office, the Writer stands to lose tens of thousands of dollars (if not hundreds of thousands) that he could have received in attorney’s fees at the end of the case had the script been registered.

Another advantage to registration with the Copyright Office is that if the Writer registers the screenplay within five years of its creation, the registration is considered prima facie evidence of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate (17 U.S.C. §410(c)).  This can be important in cases where the infringement occurs many years after creation.  I handled a case where the original work was created (and registered with the WGA) in 1981.  My client did renew the work a few times but then stopped.  By the time we filed the lawsuit (in 2006), there was no evidence in the WGA of the registration and my client was forced to prove that he actually wrote the work in 1981 (which is not easy).  Had my client simply registered with the Copyright Office at the outset, we would not have had any problem because the registration itself would be considered proof that he wrote the script.

I could give you a myriad of more examples of problems caused because a writer registered his screenplay with the Registry and not the Copyright Office.  I am not alone in my concern, as I have heard many of my colleagues who represent screenwriters in copyright infringement lawsuits express similar sentiments.

The problem is that so many writers (especially new screenwriters trying to break into Hollywood) believe that registration with the WGA is required before submitting a script, and they believe that WGA registration is just as good as registration with the Copyright Office.  This misconception continues in large part because those people running the Script Registry web site clearly want to keep writers in the dark about the importance of registration with the Copyright Office.  On the home page of the website, it refers to the service as “the Industry Standard” and the “World’s Number One Intellectual Property Service.”

Also, the WGA website downplays the importance of registration with the Copyright Office. In fact, the FAQ page of the website actively misleads writers, by making it seem as if the two registrations are equivalent.

“Does registration take the place of copyright?

Registering your work with the WGAW Registry does not take the place of registering with the Library of Congress, U.S. Copyright Office. However, both create valid legal evidence that can be used in court.

Questions regarding copyright should be directed to the U.S. Copyright Office in Washington, D.C. at (202) 707-3000 or to an attorney specializing in that area of law. Click on for more information.

If I’ve already registered my material with the U.S. Copyright Office in Washington, do I need to register it with the Guild?

Even if you have copyright through the Library of Congress, registering with the WGAW Registry creates a separate legal record for your material. In addition, you may consider registering treatments or drafts of your work-in-progress with our Registry prior to registering your final draft with the Copyright Office.”

At one point in time, the Registry served a purpose.  In the pre-internet days, when copyright registrations had to be filled out by hand and writers mailed scripts to Washington, the Registry served as a low-cost and simple way for writers to prove the existence of their script.  But the Registry’s purpose has past.  Now that writers may visit the Copyright Office website, fill out a form and upload their script without leaving their desk, the advantages of the Registry are gone.  And while the Copyright Office registration is slightly more expensive ($35), the registration lasts forever.  It doesn’t expire after 5 years as a WGA registration does.

Because of this, I would ask that each of you, as members of the board of the WGA, to think about shutting down the Script Registry.   I understand that the Script Registry is probably a very good source of revenue to the WGA.  But you should be aware that revenue received by the WGA comes at a very high cost.  It is certain that the cumulative cost to writers who did not register with the Copyright Office and later were infringed is tenfold more than the revenue received by the WGA from registrations.

If you don’t want to shut down the Script Registry, then I would ask you to think about implementing the following changes, to make sure that Writers are as protected as possible.

1) Add clear information to the Script Registry website informing writers of the importance of registration with the Copyright Office.  Yes, this may mean less people use the Script Registry because they won’t want to pay for both services.  But if you truly believe the Script Registry is as necessary as the Copyright Office registration, then put the facts out there plainly, and let your members decide.  If they still decide to register with the WGA, great.  But you should be doing everything in your power to make sure that your members are as protected as they can be in the event their material is stolen.

2) Extend the time the registration is valid.  Having a five year limit on registration made sense when screenplay were submitted on paper and the WGA was paying for a physical storage of the scripts.  But now that the majority of scripts are submitted electronically, the cost of storing the digital file is literally pennies (and drops every year).  There is no reason that the WGA could not agree to extend the time (at least for electronic submissions) to 10 or 20 years at virtually no cost.

3) Give reminders for those people who do need to renew.   As it stands now, the writer must remember to renew the registration from three months prior to three months after the five year anniversary of the registration.  I would imagine that most writers do not do this because they forget.  If the WGA won’t extend the registration time, it could easily set up a program that would automatically send out a reminder email after five years.  At the very least, it would make sure that writers who have not registered with the Copyright Office are still protected.

Thank you for your kind attention to this letter.  If you would like to discuss this further, I would be happy to meet with any of you at your convenience.

Larry Zerner


Filed under Copyright


  1. I want to state that I emphatically agree with all of your points. With my company, which is in direct competition with the WGA, we permanently keep records of registrations regardless of payment status, we go out of our way to state we are but a weigh station before the final copyright, and we offer longer registration periods. We know that by agreeing with you that the WGA should shut down the registry, we should too, but we feel the service does offer some protection before a writer or artist is ready to go forward with a copyright.

    We proceed with the idea that the artist/writer is not a person of wealth in the beginning stages of creativity and updating a copyright when just a first draft is made, is not advantageous especially in cases where the artist/writer is very active, but not monetarily stable.

    Do electronic registrations mean absolutely nothing in your opinion? How should writers and artists share their first drafts and protect them without a copyright which is often discussed in writing circles as a “bad idea” because the work can change substantially and subsequently require a new copyright?

    Perhaps artists and writers should aim their protests at reducing the fees to register a copyright so that they can create in faster larger numbers with the power of the big “C” behind them?


  2. Pingback: OPEN LETTER TO THE WGA BOARD MEMBERS | 1st 10 pages

  3. Just desire to say your article is as amazing.

    The clarity in your post is just great and i
    could assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post.
    Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.


  4. Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you
    been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is wonderful, as well as the content!


  5. Reblogged this on The Krystol Meth(od) and commented:


  6. Samantha Adams

    When starting out, I registered my first few scripts with the WGA. I thought it made me bulletproof… until I read the fine print. For the past 10 years, I’ve done only copyrights on my works. I agree with Mr. Zerner, but feel there’s NO WAY the WGA is going to stop their registry. It must generate a great deal of income for them… mainly from dilettantes, newbies and aspiring writers unaware of the fine print. It offers them ‘simple’ protection, where copyright and its application may seem daunting.

    Never thought I’d say this about an attorney, but… bravo, sir! lol


  7. My family members always say that I am killing my time here at web, however I know I am getting experience
    daily by reading thes fastidious articles.


  8. Your style is realy unique compared to other people I’ve
    resd stuff from. Thank you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will jjst bookmark this web site.


  9. I posted a tweet on this topic yesterday and Mr Zerner found it within a couple of hours and sent me this link. For the most part, I write technical articles, and have contributed freely to Wikipedia. This is my first foray into fiction/screenplay writing. I am also an entrepreneur, and I have had intellectual property stolen from me in the past, and want to protect my interests.


  10. Wil Castillo

    Thank you for taking the time and energy to compose such an illuminating open letter to the WGA. This is definitely a “must read” for all screenwriters especially the ones who are working on breaking in the Industry!!!


  11. This post is truly a nice one it assists new the weeb users, who are wishiing ffor blogging.


  12. Thank you. These are all items that I questioned when being instructed to use the WGA Registry when I wrote my first screenplay. It was very confusing and the expiration was even more unsettling. I will follow your advice moving forward. (And also keep your contact information)


  13. Reblogged this on AngeliaMaria and commented:
    Very informative and clears up the confusion of WGA Registry vs. Copyright. Must read.


  14. Extremely well written article about a topic which has bothered me since I clerked at the WGA several decades ago. Larry missed one point, which I think is valuable to mention.

    For many years, writers would sue in state court in California for breach of an implied contract (or quasi-contract) when a film came out that was too close to something they had written or pitched to people who rejected them and then produced the at-issue film. The WGA registration was used to help them support the case that their work was first in time (and they’d have to use other means to establish that the producers had access to that work upon which to base the film.)

    More recently, with the designation of the Federal courts as the exclusive jurisdiction of copyright disputes, when faced with a lawsuit for an implied contract, the studios have taken to moving the case to Federal court whenever any kind of a writing–a script, an outline, a pitch, a synopsis–exists. I suspect this is because they know that a copyright registration was never made and they are able to make pursuing the case that much more expensive to the writer.

    Copyright registration is the key to the courthouse door and a very cheap form of insurance for creators, when it is made before the work gets sent out.

    –Christine Valada


  15. Aaron Makhaya

    Iam willing to join your organasation please


  16. I believe that is among the so much vital information for me.
    And i am glad studying your article. But should observation on few basic issues,
    The site style is great, the articles is in reality nice :
    D. Excellent job, cheers


  17. Thank you so much for this information. I’m a very new writer and just registered a script with the WGAW a few months ago as their website makes it out that it as just as good as the US Copyright Office. I’m now going to register with the Office tonight.


  18. Calix8

    As both a working writer and a working indie producer, I have for years advised others to avoid WGAw registration for all of the reasons outlined above.

    It is important to point out, however, that the true function of WGAw registration has nothing to do with those protections; it’s a union (or, if you prefer, guild) function and requirement.

    As I understand it, WGAw members must register their drafts for assigned/contracted projects through the WGAw because of the automatic arbitration process.

    As I understand it, if more than one writer/team works on a project covered by a WGAw contract, then the project is automatically arbitrated by the WGAw to determine who gets screen credits. To do this, the WGAw has a “star chamber” of three anonymous members who review all of the drafts of the project as well as the completed film and from there assign credit based on their rules.

    That’s why WGAw registration exists; not for copyright or legal protection, but to service the union’s automatic credit arbitration process.

    What you’re asking for, in effect, is for the WGAw to turn off a fairly lucrative revenue stream – registering scripts for non-members in situations where the actual function isn’t going to come into play. I’ve heard that the WGAw registers about 50,000 scripts a year, which at $35 a pop comes close to $2M in basically free revenue for the guild, no real work – or risk – involved.

    I strongly suspect they’re not gonna turn off that spigot for themselves voluntarily, but articles like this which encourage people to take the life+70 LoC protection over the 5-year non-protection of non-union members regging w/the WGAw can make a difference.

    So, thanks for writing it!


  19. Beverly Walker

    Having had scripts ripped off, I was aware of the importance of registration w/Lib. of Congress. An equally egregious problem relates to the legal definition of infringement. Ideas cannot be copyrighted. That is why people who filch others’ work change the dialogue, scene sequence, gender of characters while sailing through on the central idea. Another big issue is the necessity of proving that the individual doing the stealing had access to one’s work. Given the way scripts are casually passed around via the internet, that can be very hard to prove.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s